Lynom v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State failed to rebut the defendant’s testimony that he was forced to leave his approved residence and could not reach the probation officer to inform him of his move
• finding insufficient evidence of a willful and substantial violation for failing to complete sex offender treatment program where defendant testified that he did not have the money to pay for the program
• evidence that defendant failed to continue sex offender treatment because he could not afford it was insufficient to establish a willful and substantial violation of probation
• no willful and substantial violation where defendant cannot afford to pay for sex offender treatment
• “Where a probationer makes reasonable efforts to comply with a condition of probation, violation of the condition cannot be deemed ‘willful.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).