Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was an ex post facto violation to impose a PRR sentence for offenses committed prior to the effective date of the PRR Act
• holding that it was an ex post facto violation to impose a prison releasee reoffender sentence on offenses committed prior to the effective date of the act, which was May 30, 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chambers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-11· cited 33×
• Jefferson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17· cited 3×
• Mobley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 1×
• Desmoke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Woods v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-26· cited 146×
• McKnight v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 54×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04· cited 43×
• Plain v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-14· cited 30×
• Arnold v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 11×
• State v. Cowart
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-28· cited 8×
• Ellis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-13· cited 2×