Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 991 S.W.2d 565
  • 338 Ark. 97
  • 1999 Ark. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to prove a prior conviction of kidnapping, the State was permitted to introduce testimony from the victim that the defendant raped her, as engaging in deviate sexual activity is one of the stated purposes of the crime of kidnapping
  • holding that to prove a prior conviction of kidnapping, the State was permitted to introduce testimony from the victim that the defendant raped her, as engaging in deviate sexual activity is one of the stated purposes of the crime of kidnapping
  • use of prior-violent-felony evidence admissible regardless of whether it pre- or postdated the offense being tried.
  • specifically referring to the admissibility of evidence under Rules 403 and 404(b)
  • conclusion must be supported by substantial evidence
  • conclusion must be supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavenski R. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.