Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 587 S.E.2d 187
  • 263 Ga. App. 22
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2684
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • absent an abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial court’s determination that similar transaction evidence is admissible
  • as to the purpose for which the evidence was admitted, we have held that in crimes involving sexual offenses, evidence of similar previous transactions is admissible to show the lustful disposition of the defendant and to corroborate the victim’s testimony
  • trial court did not err in admitting evidence that defendant committed a similar transaction ten years before current offense; any “claim that the prior act was too remote in time goes to the weight and credibility of the evidence, not its admissibility’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Blackburn, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.