Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of the defendant’s bisexuality “to prove intent, motive, plan, scheme and bent of mind” in prosecution for sexual abuse of a child of the same sex.
• stating the defendant’s bisexuality was relevant to prove “intent, motive, plan, scheme and bent of mind”
• “The Georgia rule favors admissibility of any relevant evidence, no matter how slight the probative value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Best v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-11· cited 12×
• Loftus v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-13· cited 2×
• State of Tennessee v. David Boyd Conner, Jr. - Concurring
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-12-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Patterson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-05· cited 153×
• Bearden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-10-09· cited 39×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-05-20· cited 25×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-06-11· cited 18×
• Wellborn v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-09-28· cited 14×
• Weathersby v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1992-03-04· cited 11×
• Hunnicutt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-03-05· cited 8×
• Crass v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-05-29· cited 7×