Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 407 S.E.2d 769
  • 200 Ga. App. 188
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “when, as here, the indictment for each offense is based on separate and distinct acts, the offenses do not merge. [Cit.]”
  • upholding trial court’s granting of State’s motion in limine to prohibit defendant’s introduction of false allegations based on failure to demonstrate “reasonable probability” that allegations were false
  • upholding trial court's granting of State's motion in limine to prohibit defendant's introduction of false allegations based on failure to demonstrate \reasonable probability\ that allegations were false
  • burden on party alleging error to show it affirmatively by the record
  • full concurrence as to Division 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Banke, Carley, Divisions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.