Williams v. Smart Chevrolet Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that plaintiff’s testimony that she shut and locked the door of the car before the door swung open in an accident did not sufficiently negate driver error
• explaining that the mere occurrence of an accident does not establish a product defect, but that additional facts tending to show the defect existed before the accident may establish a sufficient case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).