Williams v. Maremont Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that terms of employee handbook were binding on employer where handbook provided that employees would be recalled in order of seniority
• holding that terms of employee handbook were binding on employer where handbook provided that employees would be recalled in order of seniority
• holding that terms of employee handbook were binding on employer where handbook provided that employees would be recalled in order of seniority
• finding the language “employees will by the handbook’s provisions.” Id. We do not believe the be recalled in the order of seniority” to be binding
• finding the language “employees will be recalled in the order of seniority” to be binding
• noting “employees will be recalled in the order of seniority” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).