Rose v. Tipton County Public Works Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an employer may not be bound by terms in its employee handbook unless the handbook contains language asserting contractual intent
• making a similar conclusion with respect to a manual which was to. serve as a “guide”
• manual which referred to “established rules” was not held binding because manual also indicated that rules only served as a “guide”
• where the handbook contained a provision directly stating “that its policies are subject to change without notice by [the employer]”
• employee handbook not a contract unless it contains specific guarantees or binding language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).