Williams v. Laurence-David, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing trial court’s granting of plaintiff’s motion for new trial following jury verdict for defendant because of no “substantial prejudicial error”
• testimony that qualifies under other exceptions to the hearsay rule is admissible despite fact that it includes opinion
• testimony that qualifies under other exceptions to the hearsay rule is admissible despite fact that it includes opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).