Skip to main content
· 3/22/2017

DeWolf v. Mt. Hood Ski Bowl, LLC

Citations

  • 284 Or. App. 435
  • 392 P.3d 759
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petitioner’s death prior to the issuance of mandate constitutes an exceptional circumstance
  • holding that the power to recall mandate should only be exercised in \exceptional circumstances\
  • \The 'good cause' requisite for recall of mandate is the showing of need to avoid injustice.\
  • ... Court may recall mandate based upon subsequent change in law “only in ‘significant instances’ ” where the Court finds special reason for disturbing repose and finality in interest of justice
  • “[C]ourt has the power to set aside any judgment where necessary to protect the integrity of its own processes”, but “strict standards govern[ ] the exercise of power to recall a mandate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.