Williams v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party's due-process rights were violated because the opposing party filed nothing to put her on notice that she would have to defend against a particular claim
• holding that a party’s due-process rights were violated because the opposing party filed nothing to put her on notice that she would have to defend against a particular claim
• reversing a protective order to the extent it imposed conditions on the party seeking protection, where nothing put the petitioner on notice that a mutual protective order might be issued and she had no opportunity to prepare a defense before appearing at the hearing on her petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Quinby v. Rausch
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-10-08· cited 5×
• Wildes v. Clark.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-09-20· cited 5×
• Sedehi v. Chamberlin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-09· cited 5×
• Arya John Sedehi v. Amanda Chamberlin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Harris v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-09-08· cited 7×