Quinby v. Rausch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction for stalking because there was “reasonable evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion”
• evidence of stalking included that petitioner’s ex-wife hired a private investigator to follow him
• trial court could have inferred that Rausch feared bodily harm or death when he discovered that he was being followed even in the absence of any testimony as to fear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).