Williams v. Hung
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4540
Syllabus
Disqualification of an attorney abuse of discretion. An appellate court reviews a trial court's decision to disqualify an attorney for an abuse of discretion. Disqualification is a drastic measure that interferes with a party's right to choose his or her counsel and, therefore, should not be imposed unless absolutely necessary. Because the trial court neither held an evidentiary hearing on the motion to disqualify nor expounded on its reasons for the disqualification, its judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court· 1970-09-23· cited 443×
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 158×
- Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-01-21· cited 117×
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-08· cited 25×
- 155 N. High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 15×
- Douglass v. PriddyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 5×
Other cases named Williams v. Hung
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.