Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 12/8/1994

Williams v. Crichton

Citations

  • 891 F. Supp. 120
  • 33 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1798
  • 1994 WL 689199
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding attorneys’ fees to defendant because plaintiffs claim of copyright infringement was objectively unreasonable based upon the same findings that supported the defendant’s motion for summary judgment
  • the “same finding” supporting granting summary judgment to the prevailing defendant also “support[ed] the Court[’s] determination . . . that [the plaintiff’s] claim was ‘objectively unreasonable’”
  • awarding fees solely because losing party's claims were objectively unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKENNA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.