Second Circuit· 5/22/1996
Williams v. Crichton
Citations
- 84 F.3d 581
- 1996 WL 279898
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that on defendants' motion for summary judgment, \a determination of substantial similarity requires a 'detailed examination of the works themselves’\
- holding that a list of random similarities is not probative of substantial similarity “because it fails to address the underlying issue: whether a lay observer would consider the works as a whole substantially similar to one another”
- noting that similarity in pace “without more, does not create an issue of overall substantial similarity between the works”
- holding figures of muscular superheroes in fighting poses are examples of scènes à faire
- finding that even though both works involved a dinosaur zoo and both contained electrified fences, automated tours, dinosaur nurseries, and uniformed workers, such elements of settings were “scenes a faire”
- noting that the law requires “the lay observer to focus on similarities rather than differences when evaluating a work. Only when the similarities are insubstantial or unprotectable will a claim fail.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calabresi, Oakes, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc., Defendant-Cross Claimant-Appellant, Beth B. Golub, Defendant-CrossSecond Circuit· 1998-07-10· cited 296×
- Douglas Alan Stromback, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. New Line Cinema, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant, Larry HessSixth Circuit· 2004-10-08· cited 133×
- Sturdza v. United Arab EmiratesD.C. Circuit· 2002-03-08· cited 115×
- Williams v. CrichtonSecond Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 98×
- Stephen L. Bucklew v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co., Llp, and Hab, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2003-05-27· cited 90×
- Cavalier v. Random House, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-05-21· cited 68×
- Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., Hyperlaw, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. West Publishing Co. West Publishing CorporationSecond Circuit· 1998-11-03· cited 66×
- Funky Films, Inc. v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-30· cited 60×
- Murray Hill Publications, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2004-03-19· cited 59×
- Coach, Inc. v. Horizon Trading USA Inc.S.D. New York· 2012-11-07· cited 56×
- Ferdinand Pickett, Cross-Appellee v. PrinceSeventh Circuit· 2000-03-14· cited 50×
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. UMG Recordings, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2009-11-04· cited 41×
- Hogan v. DC ComicsS.D. New York· 1999-01-26· cited 40×
- Tufenkian Import/Export Ventures, Inc. v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Second Circuit· 2003-07-30· cited 39×
- Herzog v. Castle Rock EntertainmentEleventh Circuit· 1999-10-27· cited 38×
- Odegard, Inc. v. Costikyan Classic Carpets, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-05-06· cited 28×
- Randolph v. Dimension FilmsS.D. Texas· 2009-06-29· cited 26×
- Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures Corp.District of Columbia· 1999-06-30· cited 26×
- Bill Diodato Photography, LLC v. Kate Spade, LLCS.D. New York· 2005-09-27· cited 22×
- Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.S.D. New York· 2005-07-21· cited 22×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationSecond Circuit· 1990-04-20· cited 514×
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationSecond Circuit· 1930-11-10· cited 357×
- Thomas Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., David Susskind, Gill Champion, Martin Richards and Heywood GouldSecond Circuit· 1986-01-07· cited 330×
- Knitwaves, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lollytogs Ltd. (Inc.) D/B/A French Toast, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1995-11-13· cited 330×
- Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1992-04-02· cited 236×
- Reyher v. Children's Television WorkshopSupreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 235×
- South Dakota v. Spotted HorseSupreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 190×
- Rebecca Reyher and Ruth Gannett v. Children's Television Workshop and Tuesday Publications, Inc.Second Circuit· 1976-04-05· cited 182×
- Laureyssens v. Idea Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1992-05-15· cited 164×
- Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Well-Made Toy Manufacturing Corp.Second Circuit· 1994-05-27· cited 142×
- Arica Institute, Inc. v. Helen Palmer and Harper & Row Publishers, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1992-07-22· cited 105×
- Ted Berkic v. Michael Crichton, Robin Cook, Marvin Moss, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/united Artists Entertainment CompanyNinth Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 89×
- Kregos v. Associated PressSecond Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 73×
- Litchfield v. SpielbergNinth Circuit· 1984-07-06· cited 68×
- Jossi v. Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1994-02-22· cited 63×
- Barbara Horgan, as of the Estate of George Balanchine, Plaintiff v. MacMillan Inc., Ellen Switzer, Steven Caras, and CostasSecond Circuit· 1986-04-28· cited 31×
- Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-05-26· cited 27×
Other cases named Williams v. Crichton
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.