Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 5/22/1996

Williams v. Crichton

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 581
  • 1996 WL 279898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that on defendants' motion for summary judgment, \a determination of substantial similarity requires a 'detailed examination of the works themselves’\
  • holding that a list of random similarities is not probative of substantial similarity “because it fails to address the underlying issue: whether a lay observer would consider the works as a whole substantially similar to one another”
  • noting that similarity in pace “without more, does not create an issue of overall substantial similarity between the works”
  • holding figures of muscular superheroes in fighting poses are examples of scènes à faire
  • finding that even though both works involved a dinosaur zoo and both contained electrified fences, automated tours, dinosaur nurseries, and uniformed workers, such elements of settings were “scenes a faire”
  • noting that the law requires “the lay observer to focus on similarities rather than differences when evaluating a work. Only when the similarities are insubstantial or unprotectable will a claim fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Oakes, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Williams v. Crichton

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.