Williams v. Canon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The use of a trademark by a corporation’s subsidiary is not a transaction of business by the parent company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Piedmont Label Company v. Sun Garden Packing Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-06-05· cited 229×
• Calvert v. Huckins
  E.D. California· 1995-01-13· cited 67×
• DeSantis v. Hafner Creations, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1996-12-30· cited 44×
• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears Plc
  D. Delaware· 1990-07-24· cited 44×
• F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, LTD. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-27· cited 40×
• In Re MDC Holdings Securities Litigation
  S.D. California· 1990-12-12· cited 40×
• General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De Arriortua
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-11-26· cited 32×
• United States v. Toyota Motor Corp.
  C.D. California· 1983-04-08· cited 25×
• Athletes Foot of Delaware, Inc. v. Ralph Libonati Co.
  D. Delaware· 1977-11-28· cited 24×
• Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc.
  D. Oregon· 1980-08-28· cited 21×
• Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Acton Foodservices Corp.
  C.D. California· 1983-01-06· cited 17×
• Barantsevich v. VTB Bank
  C.D. California· 2013-05-29· cited 17×
• Smokey's of Tulsa, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.
  E.D. Oklahoma· 1978-07-07· cited 10×
• Monument Builders of Greater Kansas City, Inc. v. American Cemetery Ass'n
  D. Kansas· 1986-02-26· cited 7×
• Indiana Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Standard of Lynn, Inc.
  C.D. California· 1995-03-08· cited 6×
• Paulson Inv. Co., Inc. v. Norbay Securities, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 1984-10-16

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Hanson v. Denckla
  Supreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
• Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
  Supreme Court· 1953-11-30· cited 826×
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.
  Supreme Court· 1927-02-21· cited 824×
• Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 670×
• United States v. Scophony Corp. of America
  Supreme Court· 1948-04-26· cited 321×
• Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 171×
• Giusti v. Pyrotechnic Industries, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1946-06-27· cited 65×
• O.S.C. Corporation and O.S.C. Corporation of California v. Toshiba America, Inc. And Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co., Ltd.
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-02-04· cited 29×
• In Re Chicken Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. Georgia· 1975-12-24· cited 21×
• San Antonio Telephone Co., Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-08-23· cited 14×
• Hays v. United Fireworks Mfg. Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-12-09· cited 14×
• Gilson v. Pittsburgh Forgings Company
  S.D. New York· 1968-05-22· cited 12×
• Fisher Baking Company v. Continental Baking Corporation
  D. Utah· 1965-02-12· cited 11×
• SS Kresge Company v. Kamei-Autokomfort
  D. Minnesota· 1973-09-06· cited 10×
• Crow Tribe of Indians v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.
  D. Montana· 1975-12-22· cited 2×