· 6/27/2005
F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, LTD. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 407
- 130 Cal. App. 4th 782
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5771
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 7859
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1018
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that control by means of interlocking directors and officers, consolidated reporting, and shared professional services is normal
- “This [agency] theory does not treat the parent and subsidiary as one entity, but rather attributes specific acts to the parent because of the parent’s authorization of those acts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.