Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/16/1995

Williams v. Briggs Co.

Citations

  • 62 F.3d 703
  • 1995 WL 497376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Mississippi law and noting that the fifth Wade factor focuses on \an ordinary person's ability to avoid the danger by exercising care\
  • affirming district court’s finding of no spoliation where the evidence was not destroyed or lost and plaintiff offered no evidence to suggest defendant altered the evidence at issue
  • “We need not linger long over the parties’ debate about the precise significance of the repairs to the water heater, or the two-years’ use between accident and testing. These matters are left to the sound discretion of the district court.”
  • to be admissible, testing must be “substantially similar” to the incident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Duhé, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Williams v. Briggs Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.