70 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 923, 44 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 414 Philip J. Haun, Cross v. Ideal Industries, Inc., Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in an age discrimination case, a plaintiff’s coworker’s testimony that the employer was “phasing out older workers” was admissible to prove discrimination
• holding that a defendant’s admission that he did not want to hire older workers “would allow a reasonable juror to conclude” that he had discriminated against the plaintiff because of his age
• holding employer’s admission that he did not want to hire older workers “would allow a reasonable juror to conclude” that he had discriminated against plaintiff because of his age
• finding president's statement to personnel department that he did not want to hire older workers was sufficient to show company used age as a determinative factor in employment decisions generally
• “Vander Pan's opinion testimony that Ideal was phasing out older workers was based on his perception and helped the jury determine whether Ideal discriminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).