Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 8/21/2007

Williams v. Allen

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 1210
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19836
  • 2007 WL 2368028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Alabama's execution protocol consisting of ''[sodium] [t]hio-pental, [pancuronium bromide], and [potassium [c]hloride\ had remained unchanged \since its inception in 2002”
  • noting that Alabama’s lethal injection protocol consisting of three drugs had remained unchanged “since its inception in 2002”
  • noting that Alabama’s lethal injection protocol consisting of three drugs had remained unchanged “since its inception in 2002”
  • noting that “[b]oth the State and the victim’s family have a strong interest in the timely enforcement of [the defendant’s] death sentence,” and explaining that an entry of a stay would grant the defendant a “reprieve from his judgment”
  • noting “strong interest” of State and victim’s family in timely enforcement of sentence
  • upholding dismissal of § 1983 method-of-execution action based on unreasonable delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Dubina, Barkett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.