Skip to main content
· 5/9/1997

William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.

Citations

  • 110 F.3d 364
  • 1997 WL 156847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant could not complain of lack of notice where the defendant had filed a motion to dismiss
  • holding that the plaintiff could not complain of lack of notice where the defendant filed a motion to dismiss
  • holding that the defendant was prejudiced by the plaintiffs failure to cooperate in discovery because the defendant “waste[d] time, money, and effort in pursuit of cooperation which [the plaintiff] was legally obligated to provide”
  • explaining that the court “do[es] not assume that lesser sanctions were not considered simply because their consideration is not articulated”
  • holding that the defendant was prejudiced by the plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery because the defendant “waste[d] time, money, and effort in pursuit of cooperation which [the plaintiff] was legally obligated to provide”
  • insisting that “the imposition of lesser sanctions is & factor in our review, not a sine qua non for affirmance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Ryan, Suhrheinrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.