Skip to main content
· 8/29/2002

United States v. Juan Reyes, Juan A. Acevedo, Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 451
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 227
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20985
  • 2002 WL 31253724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal for failure to comply with a court order is not an abuse of discretion if the party had the ability to comply but chose not to
  • finding that counsel’s disregard of the district court’s “graciousness” in notifying “him that he had missed a filing deadline” to be “contumacious”
  • stating that “it is presumed that dismissal is not an abuse of discretion if the party has the ability to comply with a discovery order but does not”
  • stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion can provide relief from a judgment “when the judge has made a substantive mistake of law or fact in the final judgment or order
  • stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion can provide relief from a judgment “when the judge has made a substantive mistake of law or fact in the final judgment or order
  • holding that Rule 60(b)(1) “is intended to provide relief in only two situations: (1) when a party has made an excusable mistake or an attorney has acted without authority, or (2) when the judge has made a substantive mistake of law or fact in the final judgment or order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suhrheinrich, Batchelder, Little

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.