Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 11/1/1973

William A. Mitchell v. United States

Citations

  • 482 F.2d 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no limit on what the district court may consider in arriving at a new sentence.
  • petitioner need not show that an unconstitutional conviction actually enhanced his sentence; only that the conviction was considered
  • sentence vacated because of improper considerations; no limit upon resentencing other than legal máximums
  • sentence vacated because of improper considerations; no limit upon resentencing other than legal maximums

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornberry, Ains-Worth, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.