William A. Mitchell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no limit on what the district court may consider in arriving at a new sentence.
• petitioner need not show that an unconstitutional conviction actually enhanced his sentence; only that the conviction was considered
• sentence vacated because of improper considerations; no limit upon resentencing other than legal máximums
• sentence vacated because of improper considerations; no limit upon resentencing other than legal maximums

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).