Willett v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sexual acts committed close in time under similar circumstances, using same modus operandi showed common scheme or plan
• minor boy allowed to testify about a prior act of oral copulation defendant performed on the boy
• minor boy allowed to testify about a prior act of oral copulation defendant performed on the boy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitchell v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-27· cited 86×
• Derouen v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 73×
• Bigpond v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 73×
• Daly v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 59×
• Keeney v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 28×
• Williams v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-12-11· cited 26×
• Hill v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 20×
• Taylor v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-09-02· cited 16×
• Lucas v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 16×
• Simpson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-12-20· cited 13×
• Cipriano v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 10×
• Shannon Troy Derouen v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2007-05-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nester v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1959-01-20· cited 86×
• State v. McFarlin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 66×
• People v. Covert
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-03-02· cited 66×
• State v. McDaniel
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1956-06-12· cited 53×
• McMichael v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-07· cited 52×
• Brown v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-07-22· cited 32×
• Allan v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 22×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-02-09· cited 4×