Massachusetts Appeals Court· 4/22/1985
Wilkinson v. Guarino
Citations
- 19 Mass. App. Ct. 1021
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denial of Rule 60(b) relief reversed where attorney’s carelessness in not reporting new telephone number did not warrant severe sanction of dismissal
- \a rule 60 [b] motion does not bring with it an appeal from the original judgment of dismissal\
- failure to notify court of new telephone number in violation of rule 11 [d]
- Rule 60(b) denial reversed because attorney’s carelessness did not warrant sanction of dismissal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Scannell v. Ed. Ferreirinha & Irmao, Lda.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-11-16· cited 87×
- Grubert v. GrubertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-09-24· cited 80×
- Chu Tai v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-07-22· cited 59×
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-03-23· cited 25×
- Springfield Redevelopment Authority v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-03-16· cited 20×
- Doe v. RoeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-01-31· cited 16×
- Braun v. BraunMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-05-04· cited 15×
- Rubins v. PlummerColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-12-20· cited 11×
- Anderson v. Sport Lounge, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-10-16· cited 10×
- Britt v. RosenbergMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-06-07· cited 8×
- Zisler v. AyanMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1992-05-15· cited 8×
- Struett v. Arlington Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-11-13· cited 7×
- Pandey v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-02-20· cited 7×
- Scannell v. FerreirinhaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-02-04· cited 7×
- Quest Systems, Inc. v. ZeppMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-04-13· cited 5×
- Keenan v. Maybrook, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-03-12· cited 4×
- Lewandowski v. BorghiMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1989-04-10· cited 4×
- Diamond v. Hanover InsuranceMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1994-10-24· cited 3×
- Dolben Co. v. FriedmannMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2008-01-02· cited 3×
- Ruma Enterprises, Inc. v. Big Mac's Packing, Inc.Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1994-06-07· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
- Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-04-19· cited 185×
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1978-12-14· cited 165×
- Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.First Circuit· 1979-07-10· cited 76×
- Russell Blois, in His Own Behalf and in Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Elmer O. Friday, Chairman, Florida Industrial Relations CommissionFifth Circuit· 1980-02-28· cited 72×
- Robert H. Fox and Kathlene Fox v. Bill Brewer, Ranger Insurance Co., (Garnishee)Eighth Circuit· 1980-04-11· cited 67×
- Bird v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-01-29· cited 58×
- Russell v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-01-25· cited 56×
- Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-04-28· cited 46×
- Henshaw v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-03-05· cited 25×
- State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc. v. MacNeil Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-12-14· cited 21×
- Mullen Lumber Co. v. F. P. Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-04-28· cited 13×
- Charles Choate Memorial Hospital v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-05-24· cited 13×
- Ticchi v. Ambassador Cab, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-01-22· cited 9×
- Pittston Co. v. ReevesSeventh Circuit· 1959-02-12· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.