Skip to main content
· 12/14/1978

Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 586 F.2d 382
  • 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1818
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 648
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7034
  • 18 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in the absence of “a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff . . . the trial court’s discretion is limited to the application of lesser sanctions designed to achieve compliance with court orders and expedite proceedings”
  • finding no clear record of delay or contumacious conduct where counsel failed to comply with nine deadlines imposed by the rules of civil procedure or by court order
  • “The time limits placed by Rule 4(a) on the right of appeal are mandatory and jurisdictional.”
  • responsibility of plaintiff and prejudice to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Ainsworth, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.