Washington Supreme Court· 4/17/2014

Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n

Citations

180 Wash. 2d 241
327 P.3d 614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that subdivision residents had entered into short-term rentals for decades without controversy
‘‘[i]f a vacation renter uses a home for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes, this use is residential, not commer- cial’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[O]ur holding does not prohibit residential communities from prohibiting [STRs]. We merely hold that the Chiwawa River Pines community did not do so . . . .” (emphasis added)
If a vacation renter uses a home ‘for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes,’ this use is residential, not commercial, no matter how short the rental duration
“If a vacation renter uses a home ‘for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes,’ this use is residential, not commercial, no matter how short the rental duration.” (quoting Ross v. Bennett, 148 Wash.App 40, ¶ 26, 203 P.3d 383 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.