Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that subdivision residents had entered into short-term rentals for decades without controversy
• ‘‘[i]f a vacation renter uses a home for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes, this use is residential, not commer- cial’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[O]ur holding does not prohibit residential communities from prohibiting [STRs]. We merely hold that the Chiwawa River Pines community did not do so . . . .” (emphasis added)
• If a vacation renter uses a home ‘for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes,’ this use is residential, not commercial, no matter how short the rental duration
• “If a vacation renter uses a home ‘for the purposes of eating, sleeping, and other residential purposes,’ this use is residential, not commercial, no matter how short the rental duration.” (quoting Ross v. Bennett, 148 Wash.App 40, ¶ 26, 203 P.3d 383 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-26· cited 1×
• Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-24