Wilson v. Maynard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act bars enforcement of express contractual indemnity by a third party against an employer
• noting that “where an employer has provided workers’ compensation coverage, an employee constitutionally may be deprived of full legal redress for injury against his employer, both directly and indirectly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).