Skip to main content

Wiley v. Royal Cup, Inc.

Citations

  • 370 S.E.2d 744
  • 258 Ga. 357
  • 1988 Ga. LEXIS 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a non-disclosure provision could be enforced independently of an unenforceable covenant not to compete whether it is in the same or distinct provisions of the employment agreement
  • “[A] covenant not to solicit must specify with particularity the territory in which the employee is restricted from soliciting.”
  • “The ‘blue pencil theory of severability’ does not apply to employment contracts in GeorgiaSamuel . Stores, Inc. v. Abrams, 94 Conn. 248, 256, 108 A. 541, 544 (1919
  • employee acknowledged in his employment contract that names of customers constitute confidential information
  • “The ‘blue pencil theory of severability’ does not apply to employment contracts in GeorgiaSamuel . Stores, Inc. v. Abrams, 94 Conn. 248, 256, 108 A. 541, 544 (1919) (When employers unduly restrict the rights of employees, “like the. dog in the fable, they grasp too much, and so lose all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Hunt, Marshall, Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.