Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if any part of a non-compete agreement is unenforceable, the entire agreement is unenforceable
• suggesting that a no-solicitation clause might be enforceable because it “merely prohibits] the employee from calling upon or taking away customers or accounts of the employer solicited or contacted by the employee during his term of employment”
• affirming grant of interlocutory injunction when the enforceability of restrictive covenants “was a legal question which could be determined by looking solely to the language of the restrictive covenant”
• affirming grant of interlocutory injunction when the enforceability of restrictive covenants “was a legal question which could be determined by looking solely to the language of the restrictive covenant”
• affirming grant of interlocutory injunction when the enforceability of restrictive covenants “was a legal question which could be determined by looking solely to the language of the restrictive covenant”
• the enforceability of a restrictive covenant was “a legal question which could be determined by looking solely to the language of the restrictive covenant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).