Wildermann v. Wachtell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court noted that \it was clear that [the lawyer] was negligent in failing to file the lis pendens.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tormo v. Yormark
  D. New Jersey· 1975-05-12· cited 47×
• Floro v. Lawton
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-12-23· cited 29×
• Wildermann v. Wachtell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1934-04-15· cited 2×
• Reed v. Finkelstein, Levine, Gittlesohn & Tetenbaum
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-04-03· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Degen v. Steinbrink
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1922-07-14· cited 13×

Other cases named Wildermann v. Wachtell

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Wildermann v. Wachtell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1934-04-15· cited 2×
• Wildermann v. Wachtell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1932-10-15
• Wildermann v. Wachtell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1934-05-15