Tormo v. Yormark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a negligence claim 21 was proper under Rule 14(a) and stating, “The fact that Fidelity's right has not yet 22 accrued…does not affect the sufficiency of its third-party complaint”
• New Jersey law imposes duties incident to an attorney-client relationship upon one who \`assumes to give legal advice and counsel'\
• court considered deposition testimony which, although not in compliance with rule 32(a), was “at least as good as affidavits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).