Indiana Supreme Court· 9/22/1999
Wilder v. State
Citations
- 716 N.E.2d 403
- 1999 Ind. LEXIS 802
- 1999 WL 744145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony
- noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense
- noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense
- noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Selby, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Brady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-06-28· cited 128×
- Blanche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 105×
- Bartlett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 37×
- Deckard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 25×
- Minter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 22×
- Casada v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-09-28· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.