Skip to main content

Wilder v. State

Citations

  • 716 N.E.2d 403
  • 1999 Ind. LEXIS 802
  • 1999 WL 744145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony
  • noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense
  • noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense
  • noting that it is the duty of the fact-finder to assess the credibility of witness testimony and finding that the State presented evidence of the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator involved in the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Selby, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.