Skip to main content
· 9/28/1989

Casada v. State

Citations

  • 544 N.E.2d 189
  • 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 919
  • 1989 WL 112220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant’s lack of counsel at signing of stipulation agreement and during polygraph examination conducted prior to arrest did not derogate defendant’s right to a fair trial
  • Polygraph examiner properly advised Casada of his Miranda rights, so Casada’s “full awareness, before he took the examination, of his right to counsel and his failure to exercise that right constituted a clear waiver of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Shields, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.