Wilcox v. Timberon Protective Association

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where only 10 of 412 lots were in violation of the covenants, the covenants were not rendered obsolete by a substantial change
• recognizing that “restrictive covenants must be considered 4 reasonably, though strictly, so that illogical, unnatural or strained construction will not 5 be effected”
• holding covenant specifically prohibiting \mobile home[s]\ implicated mobile homes placed upon a permanent foundation
• holding covenant specifically prohibiting “mobile home[s]” implicated mobile homes placed upon a permanent foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).