Levenson v. Mobley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the general rule that the words used in a contract will be given their ordinary meaning unless the parties demonstrated an intent to use them differently
• “[A]n ambiguity does not exist merely because the parties hold competing interpretations about the meaning of a policy provision.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).