District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/29/1994
Wilcox v. State
Citations
- 638 So. 2d 527
- 1994 WL 156783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing counsel ineffective for failing to advise defendant before entering his plea that he will lose entitlement to basic gain time if adjudicated as an habitual offender
- post- Ashley decision; suggesting that ineligibility for basic gain time is a direct consequence of a plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-06-23· cited 239×
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-25· cited 194×
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-10· cited 47×
- Setzer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-28· cited 19×
- Levens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-10· cited 5×
- Bevan v. WolfsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.