Wilburn v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where statute provides adequate notice that the appellant's conduct is unlawful, the statute is not unconstitutionally vague on its face because it is not vague in all of its applications
• where statute provides adequate notice that appellant's conduct is unlawful, the statute is not unconstitutionally vague on its face because it is not vague in all of its applications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sieniarecki v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-27· cited 67×
• Jean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-16· cited 12×
• State v. Torresgrossa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-19· cited 4×
• Pickett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-20

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• Parker v. Levy
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
• Smith v. Goguen
  Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
• Coates v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,269×
• Trushin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-11-04· cited 96×
• State v. Mitro
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-04· cited 45×
• State v. Barnes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 32×
• State v. Kahles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-24· cited 26×
• Travis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-07· cited 24×
• Scott v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 14×
• Taccariello v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-13· cited 7×