Skip to main content

Jean v. State

Citations

  • 764 So. 2d 605
  • 1999 WL 393477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 893.13(1), Florida Statutes (1997), was not \impermissibly vague in all of its applications\ where the record reflected that Jean's \conduct clearly fell within the statutory prohibition;\ therefore, the statute was facially constitutional
  • holding that officer's testimony established that the drugs were sold near named church that regularly conducted religious services where officer testified that there was a \regular church\ that conducted nightly services as well as Sunday daytime masses
  • rejecting vagueness claim where the defendant's conduct fell within the conduct proscribed by the plain meaning of section 893.13(1)(e)
  • if the statute is not vague when considered under the facts at hand, then, by definition, it cannot be vague in all of its applications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.