District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/16/1999
Jean v. State
Citations
- 764 So. 2d 605
- 1999 WL 393477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 893.13(1), Florida Statutes (1997), was not \impermissibly vague in all of its applications\ where the record reflected that Jean's \conduct clearly fell within the statutory prohibition;\ therefore, the statute was facially constitutional
- holding that officer's testimony established that the drugs were sold near named church that regularly conducted religious services where officer testified that there was a \regular church\ that conducted nightly services as well as Sunday daytime masses
- rejecting vagueness claim where the defendant's conduct fell within the conduct proscribed by the plain meaning of section 893.13(1)(e)
- if the statute is not vague when considered under the facts at hand, then, by definition, it cannot be vague in all of its applications
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maestas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-30· cited 257×
- Sieniarecki v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-27· cited 67×
- Rice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-14· cited 20×
- Jones v. Williams Pawn & Gun, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-10· cited 18×
- Hobby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-12· cited 11×
- Wallace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 11×
- McHolder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-13· cited 7×
- Easley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 6×
- State v. McClellanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-07· cited 4×
- Pinkney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-16· cited 1×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-06· cited 1×
- Gabbard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-22
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 1,043×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 550×
- Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 228×
- Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-11-04· cited 96×
- State v. MitroSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-04· cited 45×
- State v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 32×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-18· cited 28×
- State v. KahlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-24· cited 26×
- Travis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-07· cited 24×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 14×
- Taccariello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-13· cited 7×
- Fox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-15· cited 5×
- Wilburn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-24· cited 4×
- Sieniarecki v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-30· cited 3×
- JPG Enterprises, Inc. v. HampsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.