Skip to main content
· 6/13/1974

Wilber Development Corp. v. Les Rowland Constr., Inc.

Citations

  • 523 P.2d 186
  • 83 Wash. 2d 871
  • 1974 Wash. LEXIS 964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Surface waters may not be artificially collected and discharged upon adjoining lands in quantities greater than or in a manner different from the natural flow thereof.\
  • “Surface waters may not be artificially collected and discharged upon adjoining lands in quantities greater than or in a manner different from the natural flow thereof.”
  • surface water discharged onto downhill property by five ditches or pipes
  • “[T]he mere fact that the amount of water reaching the plaintiffs land, by reason of the development of the platted lands, might be greater than it formerly was, would not entitle it to compensation for any resulting damage.”
  • “The allegation that the manner in which the water is deposited upon the plaintiff’s land affects the ability to drain that land, may be difficult to prove .. . but it is a material question at issue in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosellini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.