Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• decided under strict liability theory of § 402A, but referring to manufacturer's \duty to warn\ users
• decided under strict liability theory of § 402A, but referring to manufacturer’s “duty to warn” users
• plaintiff injured while using defendant’s prod uct when “Viton O-ring,” not manufactured by defendant, failed
• instruction as to a regulation requiring protective eyewear when eye injuries are probable is appropriate if evidence demonstrates plaintiff was aware of a probability of injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).