Wight v. United States
Citations
- 167 U.S. 512
- 17 S. Ct. 822
- 42 L. Ed. 258
- 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2113
Syllabus
<p>Hauling goods on tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railroad from Cincinnati to Pittsburgh and delivering them to a consignee in his warehouse' from a siding connection, and hauling similar goods for him from and to the same cities on the Baltimore and- Ohio Railroad, and delivering them to him from the station of that road in Pittsburgh, there being no siding connection, is transportation “ under substantially similar circumstances ■ and conditions,within.the meaning of -section 2 of the interstate commerce act of Eebruary 4, 1887, c. 104; and a rebate allowed him by the Baltimore and Ohio road to compensate for cartage to his warehouse is a discrimination against other shippers over that road to whom no rebate is allowed.</p> <p>Whether the same words as used in section 4 of that act have a broader meaning or a wider reach than they do as used in section.2, is not determined.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing section 2 of Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 2, recodified at 49 U.S.C. § 10741(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 376×
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 243×
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 180×
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 81×
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court· 1911-04-03· cited 73×
- L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 56×
- Int. Comm. Comm. v. DEL., L. & WRRSupreme Court· 1911-04-03· cited 55×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-11-08· cited 44×
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 43×
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1913-12-01· cited 36×
- Lehigh Valley Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 32×
- Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-21· cited 31×
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1912-06-07· cited 29×
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1908-05-25· cited 25×
- McGraw Electric Co. v. United StatesE.D. Missouri· 1954-03-19· cited 20×
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. KutterSecond Circuit· 1906-05-22· cited 18×
- Chicago & A. Ry. Co. v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1907-04-16· cited 17×
- National Gypsum Co.(Huron Cement Div.) v. United StatesW.D. New York· 1973-02-05· cited 12×
- James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1951-09-24· cited 11×
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. United StatesW.D. Pennsylvania· 1958-09-24· cited 10×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Wight v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.