Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/24/1897

Wight v. United States

Citations

  • 167 U.S. 512
  • 17 S. Ct. 822
  • 42 L. Ed. 258
  • 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2113

Syllabus

<p>Hauling goods on tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railroad from Cincinnati to Pittsburgh and delivering them to a consignee in his warehouse' from a siding connection, and hauling similar goods for him from and to the same cities on the Baltimore and- Ohio Railroad, and delivering them to him from the station of that road in Pittsburgh, there being no siding connection, is transportation “ under substantially similar circumstances ■ and conditions,within.the meaning of -section 2 of the interstate commerce act of Eebruary 4, 1887, c. 104; and a rebate allowed him by the Baltimore and Ohio road to compensate for cartage to his warehouse is a discrimination against other shippers over that road to whom no rebate is allowed.</p> <p>Whether the same words as used in section 4 of that act have a broader meaning or a wider reach than they do as used in section.2, is not determined.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing section 2 of Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 2, recodified at 49 U.S.C. § 10741(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Wight v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.