Whitney Bros. Co. v. Sprafkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the case “for further proceedings evaluating the credibility of 13 [the claimant’s] subjective complaints . . .”
• rejecting \bad faith\ finding based on alleged perjury where district court \neither explained why it concluded that the [defendants] had perjured themselves nor explained why any allegedly untrue statements were material\
• rejecting \bad faith\ finding based on alleged perjury where district court \neither ex- plained why it concluded that the [defendants] had perjured themselves nor explained why any allegedly untrue state- ments were material\
• rejecting bad faith finding based on \frivolous\ defenses because district court did not explain \how these defenses are frivolous or why they were objectively or subjectively unreasonable at the time they were advanced\
• rejecting bad faith finding based on \frivolous\ defenses because district court did not explain \how these defenses are frivolous or why they were objectively or subjectively unreasonable at the time they were advanced\
• rejecting bad faith finding based on \frivolous\ defens- es because district court did not explain \how these defenses are frivolous or why they were objectively or subjectively unreasonable at the time they were advanced\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).