Skip to main content
· 5/7/1976

Odessa CARRION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YESHIVA UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 535 F.2d 722
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11445
  • 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,919
  • 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming fees award when plaintiffs sued in federal court after “substantially the same” issues were decided in state court and noting that “in view of the failure of the previous litigation” the plaintiff’s counsel had reason to be aware that an award of fees was possible
  • the plaintiff’s testimony was characterized as an “unmitigated tissue of lies” by the trial judge
  • the plaintiff’s testimony was characterized as an “unmitigated tissue of lies” by the trial judge, who awarded attorney’s fees to the defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)
  • defendant \certainly not made whole\ by fee award of $5,000
  • defendant “certainly not made whole” by fee award of $5,000
  • “unreasonable, frivolous, meritless or vexatious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friendly, Mansfield, Mulligan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.