Hawaii Supreme Court· 1/19/1972
Whitehead v. Whitehead
Citations
- 492 P.2d 939
- 53 Haw. 302
- 1972 Haw. LEXIS 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the \jurisdictional\ nature of the domicile requirement in HRS § 580-1 did not mean that the court \was without authority to hear the case in the absence of the required proof of domicile\ but that the domicile provision \sets forth a substantive requirement for divorce\
- “A person establishes his domicile in a state by being physically present there with the intention of remaining indefinitely.”
- intent to remain shown by intent to remain in current residence indefinitely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Marumoto, Abe, Levinson, Lum, Place, Kobayashi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coleman v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1972-12-15· cited 48×
- Stottlemyer v. StottlemyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-05· cited 45×
- State v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 35×
- Cvitanovich-Dubie v. DubieHawaii Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 32×
- Fiorentino v. Probate CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-03-29· cited 31×
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-08-24· cited 28×
- Shiffman v. AskewM.D. Florida· 1973-06-01· cited 27×
- Larsen v. GalloglyD. Rhode Island· 1973-07-16· cited 18×
- Sosna v. State of IowaN.D. Iowa· 1973-07-16· cited 18×
- Mon Chi Heung Au v. LumD. Hawaii· 1973-06-19· cited 16×
- Perito v. PeritoAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-05-27· cited 11×
- Matter of Estate of MarcosHawaii Supreme Court· 1998-09-16· cited 9×
- Puckett v. PuckettHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2000-11-30· cited 9×
- Caizza v. CaizzaSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 6×
- City of Seattle v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-12-17· cited 5×
- Beals v. Kiewit Pacific Co., Inc.D. Hawaii· 1993-06-28· cited 3×
- Stottlemyer v. StottlemyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-04-04· cited 3×
- Sternshuss v. SternshussNew York Supreme Court· 1972-10-03· cited 2×
- Brawer v. PinkinsNew York Supreme Court· 1995-04-10· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 3,439×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 743×
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court· 1966-04-04· cited 721×
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court· 1966-05-31· cited 700×
- Turner v. FoucheSupreme Court· 1970-01-19· cited 642×
- Oregon v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1970-12-21· cited 575×
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 488×
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1941-11-24· cited 462×
- Williams v. FearsSupreme Court· 1900-12-10· cited 224×
- Boddie v. State of ConnecticutD. Connecticut· 1968-07-17· cited 42×
- Burg v. CanniffeD. Massachusetts· 1970-07-08· cited 37×
- Wymelenberg v. SymanE.D. Wisconsin· 1971-06-30· cited 35×
- Hasegawa v. Maui Pineapple Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1970-10-09· cited 27×
- Wheat v. WheatSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1958-12-22· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.