Skip to main content

Davis v. Davis

Citations

  • 210 N.W.2d 221
  • 297 Minn. 187
  • 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that challenge to one-year residency requirement for divorce action was not moot even though plaintiff had since satisfied requirement
  • holding that challenge to one-year residency requirement for divorce action was not moot even though plaintiff had since satisfied requirement
  • “voting, fundamental political right ... preservative of all rights.’” (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 562, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964))
  • durational residency requirement for bringing a divorce action valid, observing \not every penalty in interstate travel triggers the compelling-state-interest test\
  • durational residency requirement for bringing a divorce action valid, observing “not every penalty in interstate travel triggers the compelling-state-interest test”
  • one-year residency requirement for plaintiff in divorce action not violative of Equal Protection Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacLaughlin, Yetka, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.