Skip to main content

White v. State

Citations

  • 756 N.E.2d 1057
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1818
  • 2001 WL 1264326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the [blood relatives] of the husband are not at all related to the [blood relatives] of the wife” (citation omitted)
  • stating “[w]hen a trial court makes its sentence decision, ‘the rules of evidence, other than those concerning matters of privilege, do not apply.’”
  • “[T]he unchallenged information in the pre- sentence report alone is enough to support the trial court’s exercise of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Darden, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.