Whitaker v. Appriss, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a recall letter pertaining to gas tank components was not probative of an alleged engine defect absent expert or other evidence linking the two
• concluding expert testimony was necessary to assess whether a repair shop and car dealership had breached their duty because a car is a \complex instrumentality\ the general public is unfamiliar with
• concluding expert testimony was A-0905-23 11 necessary to assess whether a repair shop and car dealership had breached their duty because a car is a \complex instrumentality\ that the general public is unfamiliar with
• explaining \[p]urely economic damages are addressed by the . . . relevant sections of the Uniform Commercial Code\ that pertain to express and implied warranties
• requiring a qualified expert to opine on esoteric issues involving a complex instrumentality to determine why car engine seized
• requiring a qualified expert to opine on esoteric issues involving a complex instrumentality to determine why car engine seized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).