Skip to main content
· 12/6/2011

Marr v. Bank of America, NA

Citations

  • 662 F.3d 963
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24134
  • 2011 WL 6091806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that party opposing summary judgment must “point to evidence that can be put in an admissible form at trial, and that, if believed by the fact‐finder, could support judgment in his favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Tinder, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.